Genetic Improvement Strategy of Indigenous Cattle Breeds: Effect of Cattle Crossbreeding Program in Production Performances

Main Article Content

Teweldemedhn Mekonnen
Yosef Tadesse
Selam Meseret

Abstract

The aim of the review is to summarize the fragmented production performance information on the effects of cattle crossbreeding in different parts of the globe. Most studies indicated that cattle crossbreeding practices conducted under extensive management system for small scale dairy farms is attractive because the optimum requirement (50-62.5%) of exotic cattle blood level inheritance was maintained. However, most developing countries do not use systematic crossbreeding programme. For example, dairy cattle crossbreeding programme in Ethiopia lacks clear breeding policy regarding the breed type to be used and the level of exotic blood inheritance across different agro-ecology and production system. Heterosis is an essential advantage of crossbreeding and maximum heterosis is realized in the first cross (F1) of distinctly different breeds. The purpose of crossbreeding in beef cattle is partly to combine breed differences and partly to make use of heterosis to improve production. Heterosis is highest in F1 generation compared to F2, F3 and F4 crossbred generations. Therefore, terminal crossbreeding is very important in livestock production particularly in beef production. Holstein Friesian dairy cattle produce 40-60% lowered milk yield under tropical and subtropical conditions compared to temperate conditions, and this is due to the exposure of the animals to the different stress factors in the tropical and subtropical conditions. The review also revealed that crossbreeding programme has significant effect in birth weight because all F1 crossbred calves have highest birth weight compared to the purebred calves of Zebu, Sanga and Zenga breeds. Heterosis in a sound crossbreeding program could increase productivity in the beef cow herd by as much as 26% over a comparable straight breeding program. In general, crossbreeding in tropical countries is undertaken to combine superior hardiness, heat tolerance, disease tolerance and/or resistance and environmental adaptability of indigenous cattle with superior milk yield and faster growth rates of exotic temperate breeds. Crossbreeding is one tool to minimize the negative impacts of inbreeding depression in livestock sector. Through crossbreeding there is a chance to have highly productive and adapted breeds. Crossbreeding also affects milk fat and protein compositions of purebred cattle. However, if crossbreeding is indiscriminate and uncontrolled, it may result in poor production performance. Furthermore, a number of studies indicated that indiscriminate and uncontrolled crossbreeding is a major threat to sustainable conservation and utilization of indigenous cattle breeds. Therefore, crossbreeding must be introduced in controlled farms.

Keywords:
Crossbreeding, heterosis, performance, milk yield, birth weight.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mekonnen, T., Tadesse, Y., & Meseret, S. (2020). Genetic Improvement Strategy of Indigenous Cattle Breeds: Effect of Cattle Crossbreeding Program in Production Performances. Journal of Applied Life Sciences International, 23(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.9734/jalsi/2020/v23i130140
Section
Review Article

References

DAGRIS (Domestic Animals Genetic Resources Information System); 2009.
Available:http://dagris.ilri.cgiar.org/display.asp
(Cited in June 2019)

Rege JEO, Aboagye GS, Tawah CL. Shorthorn cattle of West and Central Africa I. Origin, distribution, classification and population statistics. World Animal Review. 1994;78.

Wuletaw Z. Indigenous cattle genetic resource, their husbandry practices and breeding objectives in northwestern Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia; 2004b.

Kiwuwa GH, Trail JCM, Kurtu MY, Worku G, Anderson FM, Durkin J. Crossbred dairy cattle productivity in Arsi Region, Ethiopia. ILCA Research Report No. 11, September 1983, International Livestock Centre for Africa; 1983.

Rendel J. The Role of breeding and genetics in animal production improvement in the developing countries. symposium on animal genetics: XIII International Congress of Genetics. livestock research and education service, Animal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy; 1974.

Udo HMJ, Aklilu HA, Phong LT, Bosma RH, Budisatria IGS, Patil BR, et al. Impact of intensification of different types of livestock production in smallholder crop‐livestock systems. Livest. Sci. 2011; 139:22‐29.

Gandini GC, Oldenbroek JK. Choosing the conservation strategy. In: Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal gen. resources. Oldenbroek J.K. (ed.). D‐DLO, Lelystad; 1999.

Pilling D. Genetic impact assessment‐summary of a debate. Anim. Genet. Resour. Information. 2007;41: 101‐107.

Samdup T, Udo HMJ, Eilers CHAM, Ibrahim MNM, Zijpp AJ. Crossbreeding and intensification of smallholder crop‐cattle farming systems in Bhutan. Livest. Sci. 2010;131:126‐134.

Marshal K. Optimizing the use of breed types in developing country livestock production systems: a neglected research area. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2014;14:1‐2.

Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Schwulst FJ, Koch RM. Effects of heterosis on maternal performance and milk production in Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1974;38:728-745.

Koger M, Peacock FM, Kirk WG, Crockett JR. Heterosis effects on weaning performance of Brahman-Shorthorn calves. J. Anim. Sci. 1975;40:826-822.

Gregory KE, Cundiff, LV. Crossbreeding in beef cattle: Evaluation of systems. J. Anim. Sci. 1980;51:1224-1242.

Lamb MA, Tess MW, Robinson OW. Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: I. Cow-calf segment. J. Anim. Sci. 1992;70:689-699.

MacNeil MD, Newman S. Using heterosis to increase profit. Proc. Int. Beef Symp. Great Falls, Montana. 1991;129-134.

Mac Neil MD. Beef cattle management: Crossbreeding. In: Encyclopedia of Animal Science. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY; 2005.

MacNeil MD, Matjuda LE. Breeding objectives for angus and charolais specialized sire lines for use in the emerging sector of South African beef production. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2007;37:1-7.

Evans J, McPeake CA. Crossbreeding beef cattle i, division of agricultural sciences and natural resources. Oklahoma State University, America; 1914.

Delgado C, Rosegrant M, Steinfeld H, Ehui S, Courbois C. Livestock to 2020: The next food revolution. Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 28. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 1999.

Delgado C, Rosegrant M, Steinfeld H, Ehui S, Courbuis C. Livestock to 2020: The next food revolution. Outlook on Agric. 2001;30:27-29.

Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, Haan C. Lifestock’s long shadow – environmental issues and options, FAO, Rome; 2006.
(ISBN 9978-92-5-105571-7)

FAO, IFAD, WFP. The state of food insecurity in the world 2013. The multiple dimensions of food security. Rome, FAO; 2013.

FAO/IAEA (Food and Agriculture Organization/ International Atomic Energy Agency). International symposium on sustainable improvement of animal production and health; 2009.

Azage T, Tsehay R, Alemu G, Hizkas K. Pastoralism and agro-pastoralism which way forward. Milk recording and herd registration in Ethiopia: An essential step towards genetic improvement for milk production. In: Pro. of 8th Annual Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) 24-26. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2000.

Das PK, Ali SZ, Islam ABM, Roy BK. A comparative study of productive and reproductive performance and estimates of heritability for economic traits in different genetics groups available at Baghabarighat milk pocket area of Bangladesh. Onlin. J. Biol. Sci. 2003;3: 726-740.

Tahir U, Muhammad SQ, Ying Y, Yachun W. Influence of various environmental factors on dairy production and adaptability of holstein cattle maintained under tropical and subtropical conditions. Advances in Environmental Biology. 2013;7(2):366-372
(ISSN 1995-0756)

Hahn GL. Housing and management to reduce climatic impacts on livestock. J. Anim.Sci. 1981;52:175-186.

Jhonson HD, Vanjonack WJ. Effects of environmental and other stressors on blood hormone patterns in lactating animals. J.Dairy Sci. 1976;59:1603-1617.

Walshe MJ, Grindle J, Nell A, Bachmanu M. Dairy development in sub-Saharan Africa- a study of issues and options. World Bank technical paper. Africa Technical Department Series. 1991;135.

Falvey L, Chanthalakkhan C. Smallholder dairying in the tropics. International livestock research institute, Nairobi, Kenya. 1999;462.

Boichard D, Bonaiti B, Barbat A. Effect of holstein crossbreeding in the French black and white cattle population. Journal of Dairy Science. 1993;76(4):1157-1162.

McAllister AJ. Is crossbreeding the answer to questions of dairy breed utilization? Journal of. Dairy Science. 2002;85:2352-2357.

Hansen LB. Monitoring the worldwide genetic supply for dairy cattle with emphasis on managing crossbreeding and inbreeding. 8th World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; 2006.

Smith C. Genetic improvement of livestock using nucleus breeding units. World Anim. Rev. 1988;65:2-10.

Bondoc OC, Smith C, Gibson JP. A review of breeding strategies for genetic improvement of dairy cattle in developing countries. Anim. Breed. Abstract. 1989;57:819-829.

Rege JEO. Genetic analysis of reproductive and productive performance of friesian cattle in Kenya. 1. Genetic and phenotypic parameters. J. Anim. Breed. Gen. 1991;108:412-423.

Ojango JM, Ducrocq KV, Pollott GE. Survival analysis of factors affecting culling early in the productive life of Holstein- Friesian cattle in Kenya. Livestock Prod. Sci. 2005;92:317-322.

Aynalem H, Joshi K, Workneh A, Azage T, Singh A. Genetic evaluation of Boran cattle and their crosses with holstein friesian in central Ethiopia: Milk production traits. Animal. 2009;3(4):486-493.

EARO (Ethiopian Agriculture Research Organization). Livestock Research Strategy: Executive Summary. EARO, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 1999.

FAOSTAT. FAO statistical yearbook. Rome, Food Agr. Organ. Unit. Nat; 2009.

MoA (Ministry of Agriculture). Livestock growth strategy and action. Draft discussion paper. Addis Ababa, MoA. (Amharic version); 2012.

Ali TE, Ahamed FA, Ombabi YA. Productivity of crossbred zebu cattle with different levels of Friesian blood. Sudan J. Anim. Prod. 1988;1(2):69-79.

MacNeil MD, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE. Crossbreeding systems for beef production. Appl. Agric. Res. 1988;3:44-54.

Burrow HM. Utilization of diverse breed resources for tropical beef production. 8th World congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil; 2006.

Simms DD, Zoellner KO, Schalles RR. Crossbreeding beef cattle cooperative extension service. Kansas State University, Manhattan; United States Department of Agriculture Cooperating; 1990.

Said R, Bryant MJ, Msechu JKK. The survival, growth and carcase characteristics of crossbred beef cattle in Tanzania. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2003;35:441‐454.

Scholtz MM, Manus CM, Okeyo AM, Theunissen A. Opportunities for beef production in developing countries of the southern hemisphere. Livest. Sci. 2011; 142:195‐202.

Calegare L, Alencar MM, Packer IU, Lanna DPD. Energy requirements and cow/calf efficiency of Nellore and Continental and British Bos taurus X Nellore crosses. J. Anim. Sci. 2007; 85:2413-2422.

Swan AA, Kinghorn BP. Evaluation and exploitation of crossbreeding in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 1992;75: 624–639.

Subha G, Rajesh W, Parveez AP, Praveen KP, Avinash K, Subhash S. Development of Crossbred Cattle in India: A Review. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 2015;5(10):75-77.
Available:Website: www.ijetae.com
(ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal.

Singh CV. Crossbreeding in cattle for milk production: Achievements, challenges and opportunities in india-A review. Adv Dairy Res. 2016;4:158.
DOI: 10.4172/2329 888X.1000158

Tomar SS. Textbook of animal breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi; 2009.

Cunningham EP, Syrstad O. Crossbreeding bos indicus and Bos taurus for milk production in the tropics. FAO Animal Production and Health.1987;68.

Tadesse M, Dessie T. Milk production performance of Zebu, Holstein Friesian and their crosses in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2003;15(3).

Demeke S, Neser FWC, Schoeman SJ, Erasmus GJ, Van Wyk JB, Gebrewolde A. Crossbreeding Holstein-Friesian with Ethiopian Boran cattle in a tropical highland environment: Preliminary estimates of additive and heterotic effects on milk production traits: © South African Society of Animal Science, South African Journal of Animal Science; Short paper and poster abstracts: 38th Congress of the South African Society of Animal Science; 2000.

Schaeffer LR, Burnside EB, Glover P, Fatehi J. Crossbreeding results in canadian dairy cattle for production, reproduction and conformation. The Open Agriculture Journal. 2011;5:63-72.

Muller CJC, Goni S, Dzama K, Botha JA. The beef production of a Jersey herd as affected by crossbreeding using Fleckvieh sires. Proc. Assoc. Advmt. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2013;20:443-446.

Kargo M, Madsen P, Norberg E. Short communication: Is crossbreeding only beneficial in herds with low management level? J. Dairy Sci. 2012;95:925-928.

Touchberry RW. Crossbreeding effects in dairy cattle: The Illinois experiment, 1949-1969. J. Dairy Sci. 1992;75(2):640-667.

Caraviello DZ. Crossbreeding dairy cattle; Dairy updates: Reproduction and genetics No. 610. The Babcock Institute University of Wisconsin; 2004.

Galukande GE. Comparison of production systems with purebred Ankole vs. crossbred Ankole-Friesian animals on-farm using a combined cross-sectional and longitudinal approach (Kiruhura District of Uganda). PhD Thesis. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria; 2010.

Goshu G. Breeding efficiency, lifetime lactation and calving performance of friesian boran crossbred cows at Cheffa farm, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2005;17.
[Article #73]

Cunningham EP, Syrstad O. Crossbreeding bos indicus and Bos taurus for milk production in the tropics. FAO animal production and health. 1988;68.

Theunissen A, Scholtz MM, Neser FWC. An overview of crossbreeding in beef cattle with reference to the Southern African situation, Applied Animal Husbandry & Rural Development. 2013;6.

Kahi AK. Crossbreeding systems and appropriate levels of exotic blood: Examples from Kilifi Plantations. Department of Animal Science, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536, Njoro 20107, Kenya; 2002.

Elemam MB, Nekheila AMA. Some productive traits of crossbred dairy cows in the farm of University of Khartoum, Sudan; Animal science, Emir. J. Food Agric. 2012; 24(2):155-158.

Kefyalew A, Damitie K. The effect of crossbreeding on performance of crossbred dairy cows and indigenous cattle genetic resources in the North Western Amhara, Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports. 2015;8(5):1-7.
[Article no.JSRR.18508]
[ISSN: 2320-0227]
Available:www.sciencedomain.org

Aynalem H, Workneh A, Noah K, Tadelle D, Azage T. Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran cattle for meat and milk production. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 26. Nairobi, Kenya, ILRI; 2011.

Mulugeta A, Belayeneh A. Reproductive and lactation performances of dairy cows in Chacha Town and nearby selected kebeles, North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2013;1(1):008-017.
[ISSN 2329-9312]
Available:http://wsrjournals.org/journal/wjas

Metaxas L. The production performance of Holstein and Fleckvieh x Holstein cows in an intensive feeding system. MSc Thesis, Stellenbosch University; 2016.

Habtamu A, Ulfina G, Jiregna D, Mulugeta K, Gizaw K. Impact distribution of crossbred (Friesian- Horro) heifers on livelihoods per-urban dairy farm of Nekemte, Bako and Gimbi towns, Western Oromia, Ethiopia, Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development. 2011; 4(16):423-427.

Haas YD, Smolders EAA, Hoorneman JN, Nauta WJ, Veerkamp RF. Suitability of cross-bred cows for organic farms based on cross-breeding effects on production and functional traits, Animal (2013), and The Animal Consortium. 2012;7(4):655-664.
DOI:10.1017/S1751731112002042

Alphonsus C, Essien IC, Akpa GN, Barje PP. Factors Influencing Milk Yield Characteristics in Bunaji and Friesian x Bunaji Cows in Northern Nigeria. Animal Production. n.d. 2011;13(3):143-149.

Getu A, Guadu T, Addisu Sh, Asefa A, Birhan M, Mogese N, Chanie M, Bogale B, Alebie A, Feresebhate A, Fantahun T, Mitiku T. Crossbreeding challenges and its effect on dairy cattle performances in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. 2016;6(5):96-102.

Schoeman SJ, Dadi H, Jordaan GF, Westhuizen J. van der. The effect of charolais and hereford sires and straightbred and crossbred dams on pre-weaning growth of calves. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2002;32(1):38-43.

Tellah M, Michel A, Adoum IY, Souleyman MS, Logtene YM. Effect of genotype on the milk production of crossbred cows in the peri-urban area farms of N’djamena, chad. J. Anim. Health Prod. 2019;7(2):75-80.

Swalve HH. Crossbreeding in dairy cattle: International trends and results from crossbreeding data in Germany. Lohmann information. 2007;42(2):38-46.

Weigel KA. Crossbreeding: A Dirty word or an opportunity? Proceedings from the Western dairy management conference. Reno, NV, USA. 2007;7-9.

Heins B, Hansen L, Seykora F. The California experience of mating Holstein cows to A.I. sires from the Swedish Red, Norwegian Red, Montbeliarde, and Normande breeds (Updated results of crossbreeding of dairy cattle). University of Minnesota, department of animal science, dairy cattle research; Crossbreeding of Dairy Cattle; 2007.
Available:http://www.ansci.umn.edu/research/California%20update%202007-kg.pdf.

Md. Akhtarul Islam, Md. Jalal Uddin Sarder, Syed Sarwar Jahan, Md. Hemayatul Islam. Evaluate the productive and reproductive performance considering genotypes of dairy cows. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. Special Issue: Analytical and Microbiological Characterization of Antimicrobial Peptides. 2016;5(6-1):10- 15.
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.s.2016050601.13

Ahmed FA, Babiker BA, Mohamed TM, Ali TE. The effect of genetic upgrading of Kenana (Sudan zebu cattle) with European Friesian on calf performance, milk yield and milk composition. Revue Elev. Med. Vet. Pays trop. 1992;45(3-4):329-333.

Mebrahtom B, Hailemichael N. Comparative evaluation on productive and reproductive performance of indigenous and crossbred dairy cow managed under smallholder farmers in Endamehoni District, Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 2016; 6(17)96-100.

Heins BJ, Hansen LB, Seykora AJ, Hazel AR, Johnson DG, Linn JG. Short communication: Jersey × Holstein crossbreds compared with pure Holsteins for production, mastitis and body measurements during the first 3 lactations. Journal of Dairy Science. 2011;94:501-506.

Heins BJ, Hansen LB, Hazel AR, Seykora AJ, Johnson DG and Linn JG. Short communication: Jersey × Holstein crossbreds compared with pure holsteins for body weight, body condition score, fertility, and survival during the first three lactations. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012b; 95:4130-4135.

Dechow CD, Rogers GW, Cooper JB, Phelps MI, Mosholder AL. Milk, fat, protein and somatic cell score and days open among Holstein, Brown Swiss and their crosses. Journal of Dairy Science. 2007;90:3542–3549.

Wassie T, Mekuriaw G, Mekuriaw Z. Milk production performances of Holstein Friesian x Arsi and Holstein Friesian x Boran cross-bred cattle at Agarfa Agricultural Technical Vocational and Educational Training (ATVET) College, Oromia, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2014;26(154).

Demissu H, Fekadu B, Gemeda D. Early growth and reproductive performances of horro cattle and thier F1 Jersey Crosses in and around Horro-Guduru Livestock Production and Research Center, Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal. 2013;2(3):134-141.
Available:www.starjournal.org

Demissu H, Fekadu B, Gemeda D. Dairy productive potential, challenges and production opportunities of horro and their F1 Jersey crossbred cows. A Case of Guduru Livestock production and Research Center and Its Surroundings, West Oromia, Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal. 2014;3(4):79-84.

Mohamed-Khair A. Ahmed, Ahmed B. Teirab, Lutfi M.-A. Musa, Kurt J. Peters. Milk production and reproduction traits of different grades of Zebu x Friesian crossbreds under semi-arid conditions. 2007; Arch. Tierz., Dummerstorf Humboldt-universität zu Berlin, Institute of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding in the Tropics and Subtropics, Berlin, Germany. 2007;50(3):79-84.

Roschinsky R, Kluszczynska M, Sölkner J, Puskur R, Wurzinger M, Smallholder experiences with dairy cattle crossbreeding in the tropics: From introduction to impact. Animal (2015), © The Animal Consortium. 2014;9(1):150-157.
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114002079

Djoko TD, Mbah DA, Mbanya JN, Kamga P, Awah NR, Bopelet M. Crossbreeding cattle for milk production in the tropics: Effects of genetic and environmental factors on the performance of improved genotypes on the Cameroon Western High Plateau. Revue Élev. Méd. vét. Pays trop., 2003;56(1-2): 63-72.

N’Goran KE, Gbodjo ZL, M’Bari KB, Loukou NE, DoumbiaL, Dosso R. Reproduction And production comparative analysis of F1n’dama X Montbéliarde and holstein in the dairy station of Yamoussoukro In Côte D’ivoire. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2017;8(6):17821-17827.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2017.0806.0427

Els DL. Kruisteling vir vleisproduksie. PhD Thesis, University of the Free State; 1988.

Kumar N, Eshetie A, Abreha T, Yizengaw HA. Productive performance of indigenous and HF crossbred dairy cows in Gondar, Ethiopia, Veterinary World. 2014;7(3):177-181.
Available:www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.7/March-2014/13.pdf

Melku M, Kefyalew A, Solomon G. Milk production performances of local and crossbred dairy cows in West Gojam Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Journal of Applied Animal Science. 2017; 10(1):35-46.

Saha S, Carraro L, Bittante G, Gallo L. Body and milk quality traits of purebred Holstein and three-generation crossbred cows from Viking Red, Montbéliarde, and Holstein sires. Short communication, Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2018;19(4):760-765.

Beyene K. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic effects for growth, milk yield and reproduction traits of crossbred (Bos taurus X Bos indicus) cattle in the wet and dry environment in Ethiopia. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University. Ithaca, New Zealand. 1992;235.

Goshu M. Evaluation of indigenous strains for milk production. In: Summary of Animal Production Research (1968-1980). Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center; 1981.

EIAR. 2. Livestock breeding policy. A working Paper. 2001;14.

MOARD (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development). Livestock Development Master Plan Study. Phase I Report-Data Collection and Analysis. MOARD, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2007.

Abdinasir IB. Smallholder dairy production and dairy technology adoption in the mixed farming system in Arsi highland, Ethiopia. PhD Dissertation. Humboldt University of Berlin, Department of Animal Breeding in the Tropics and Subtropics, Germany; 2000.

Tesfaye K. Smallholder dairy in Ethiopia. In: Future of Livestock industries in East and Southern Africa. Proceedings of a Workshop. Kadoma Ranch Hotel, Zimbabwe; 1995.

Moges D. Long-term evaluation of milk production and reproductive performance of dairy cattle at Alemaya. In: Proceedings of the sixth annual conference of the ethiopian society of animal production. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 1998;176-183.

APRU (Animal Production Research Unit). Livestock and range research in Botswana. Ministry of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana; 1986.

Siddiquee NU, Wadud MA, Bhuiyan MSA, Rahman AKMA, Amin MR, Bhuiyan AKFH. Suitability of temperate and tropical crossbred dairy cattle under peri-urban production System In Bangladesh. Animal Review. 2014;1(2):26-36.
[ISSN(e): 2409-6490, ISSN(p): 2412-3382]

Scholtz MM, Theunissen A. The use of indigenous cattle in terminal cross-breeding to improve beef cattle production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Animal Genetic Resources. © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010; 46:33-39.
DOI:10.1017/S2078633610000676

Mostari MP, Khan MYA, Roy BK, Hossain SMJ, Huque KS. Growth performance of yearling F1 progeny of different crossbred beef cattle. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2017;46(2): 82-87.

Pitchford WS, Deland MPB, Siebert BD, Malau-Aduli AEO, Bottema CDK. Genetic variation in fatness and fatty acid composition of crossbred cattle, J. Anim. Sci. American Society of Animal Science. 2002;80:2825–2832.

Zelalem A, Biniam M, Tilaye D. Reproductive and lactation performance of crossbred dairy cows in Bishoftu, Ada`a district of East Shoa, Eastern Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J., Oct-Dec. 2015;4(4):113- 119.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/star.v4i4.16
[ISSN: 2226-7522(Print) and 2305-3372(Online)]

Niraj Kumar, Alemayehu Eshetie, Berihu Gebrekidan and Endale Balcha Gurmu. Reproductive performance of indigenous and HF crossbred dairy cows in Gondar, Ethiopia. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS). 2014;7(1):56-61.
[e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372]
Available:www.iosrjournals.org

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). A summary of milk production across the world; 2010.
Available:http://www.thecattlesite.com/articles/2526/a-summary-of milk-production-across-the-world.
[Accessed on 4 May 2018]

FAOSTAT. Milk production; 2010.
Available:http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=569#ancor
[Accessed on 4 May 2018]