Phytodiversity Analysis of Tree Species of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary (KWLS), Odisha, India

Main Article Content

R. Saravanan
K. A. Sujana
D. Kannan


Aim: The study aimed to investigate tree diversity in Kuldiha wildlife sanctuary of Odisha. Twenty (20) plots of 100 sqm each were established in three different disturbed zones within the forest.

Methodology: Important quantitative analysis such as density, frequency and abundance of tree species were determined along with the diversity indices which would give a better understanding of the forest structure. 

Results: The study revealed a total of 118 tree species of 95 genera distributed in 39 families, were recorded in the different study areas of the forest. From the distribution index it was seen that nearly 80% of the species showed contiguous distribution in the core area. The buffer zone exhibited maximum proportion of the species (25%) with random distribution. In tree species, the value of species richness (Dmg) was highest in core area (14.852) and lowest in periphery area (7.114). The value of species diversity (H’) in tree species was highest in core area (4.332) and lowest in periphery area (3.115). Simpson index of dominance was calculated by using the important value of the plant species which showed minor variation within the study site. The value of dominance (D) in tree species was found to be highest in core area 0.982) and lowest in periphery area (0.931).

Conclusion: The forest of KWLS harbours a rich diversity of flora and these diversity indices would give an important insight on laying the conservation strategies in this forest.

Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary (KWLS), Odisha, tree species diversity, disturbance zones.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saravanan, R., Sujana, K. A., & Kannan, D. (2019). Phytodiversity Analysis of Tree Species of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary (KWLS), Odisha, India. Journal of Applied Life Sciences International, 22(4), 1-14.
Original Research Article


Gentry AS. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1988;75:1-34.

Rennolls K, Laumonier Y. Species diversity structure analysis at two sites in the tropical rain forest of Sumatra. J. Trop. Ecol. 2000;16:253e270.

Ozcelik R. Tree species diversity of natural mixed stands in eastern Black seaand western Mediterranean region of Turkey. J. Environ. Biol. 2009;30(5):761-766.

Sheil D. Tropical forest diversity environmental change and species augmenta¬tion after the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. J. Veg. Sci. 1999; 10:851-860.

Ramirez-Marcial N, Gonzalez-Espinosa M, Williams-Linera G. An¬thropogenic disturbance and tree diversity in montane rain forests in Chiapas, Mexico. For. Ecol. Manage. 2001;154:311-326.

Sapkota IP, Tigabu M, Odén PC. Spatial distribution, advanced regeneration and stand structure of Nepalese Sal (Shorea robusta) forests subject to disturbances of different intensities. For Ecol Manage. 2009; 257:1966–1975.

Kumar A, Ram J. Anthropogenic disturbances and plant biodiversity in for-ests of Uttaranchal, Central Himalaya. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005;14:309-331.

Younes T. Ecosystem function of biodiversity: A progress report on the IUBS SCOPE-UNESCO Programme. Bull. Internationale. 1992;24:16–21.

Davis G, Richardson D. Mediterranean Type Ecosystems: The Function of Biodiversity. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1995.

Evariste FF, Bernard-Aloys N, Nole T .The important of habit characteristics for tree diversity in the Mengame Gorilla Reserve (South Cameroun). Int. J. Biodiver. Conserv. 2010;2:155-165.

Turner MG. Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987.

Attua EM, Pabi O. Tree composition, richness & diversity in the forest–savanna ecotone of Ghana. J. App. Biosci. 2013; 69:5437–5448.

Condit R, Ashton PS, Manokaran N, Lafrankie JV, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. Dynamics of the forestcommunities at Pasoh and Barro Colorado: comparing two 50 haplots. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 1999; 354:1739–1748.

Laurance WF, Albernaz AKM, Fearnside PM, Vasconcelos HL, Ferreira LV. Defor-estation in Amazonia. Science. 2004;304: 1109-1111.

Mohandass D, Davidar P. Floristic structure and diversity of a tropical montane evergreen forest (shola) of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Trop. Ecol. 2009;50:219-229.

Phillips OL, Martı ́nez RV, Vargas PN, Monteagudo AL, Zans MC, Sanchez WG, Cruz AP, Timana M, Yli-Halla M, Rose S. Efficient plot-based floristic assessment of tropical forests. J. Trop. Ecol. 2003;9:629–645.

Baraloto C, Molto Q, Rabaud S, Hérault B, Valencia R, Blanc L, Fine PVA, Thompson J. Rapid simultaneous estimation of above ground biomass and tree diversity across Neotropical forests: A comparison of field inventory methods. Bitropica. 2013;45: 288-298.

Warger MJA, Morrel VE. Plant species and plant communities: Some conclusion. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Nijmegen: The Netherlands; 1976;167–175.

Champion HG, Seth SK. A revised survey of forest types of India, New Delhi: Govt. Of India press. 1968;404.

Hooker, J.D. The Flora of British India. Vol. 1–7. London: L. Reeve & Co.; 1872– 1897.

Haines HH. Botany of Bihar and Orissa. London: Arnold & Sons and West Nirman Ltd.;1921.

Mooney HF. Supplement to the Botany of Bihar and Orissa. Ranchi: Catholic Press; 1950.

IPNI. International Plant Names Index; 2019.

Curtis JT, Mc-lntosh RP. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecol. 1950; 32:434–455.

Curtis JT. The vegetation of Wisconsin. Madison: Wisconsin Press; 1959.

Misra R. Manual of plant ecology. 3rd Edition, New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.; 1989.

Sorensen T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant society based on the similarity of species content. Danske Vedenk. Selsk. 1948;5:1–34.

Magurran AE. Ecological diversity and its measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1988.

Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematics theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois press. 1963;117.

Simpson EH. Measurements of diversity. Nature 1949;163:188.

Thakur AS. Floristic composition, life-forms and biological spectrum of tropical dry deciduous forest in Sagar District, Madhya Pradesh, India. Trop. Pl. Res. 2015;2(2): 112–119.

Vinayaka KS, Krishnamurthy YL. Floristic composition and vegetation analysis of HulikalGhat region, central Western Ghats, Karnataka. Trop. Pl. Res. 2016;3(3):654–661.

Pattanaik C, Reddy CS, Murthy MSR. Geospatial modelling of biological richness in Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary of Orissa, India. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2010; 38(3):477-485.

Visalakshi N. Vegetation analysis of two tropical dry evergreen forests in southern India. Trop. Ecol. 1995; 36:117–127.

Gentry AH. Diversity and floristic composition of Neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock, S.H., Mooney, H.A. & Medina, E. Editors. Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1995;146–194.

Mishra R, Upadhyay VP, Mohanty R. Vegetation ecology of the Similipal biosphere reserve, Orissa, India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2008;6(2):89-99.

Kharkwal G, Rawat YS. Structure and composition of vegetation in subtropical forest of Kumaun Himalaya. African J. Pl. Sci. 2010;4(4):116–121.

Misra, R. Ecology Work Book. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.; 1968;244.

Kadavul K, Parthasarathy N. Biodiversity and Conservation. 1999;8:419.

Proctor J, Lee Y, Langley A, Munro W, Nelson T. Ecological Studies on Gunung Silam, a Small Ultrabasic Mountain in Sabah, Malaysia. I. Environment, Forest Structure and Floristics. J. Ecol. 1988; 76(2);320-340.

Sahu SC, Dhal NK, Reddy CS, Pattanaik C, Brahman M. Phytosociological study of tropical dry deciduous forest of Boudh district, Orissa, India. Res. J. Forest. 2007; 1(2):66–72.

Whitford PB. Distribution of woodland plants in relation to succession and clonal growth. Ecol. 1948;30:199–208.

Odum EP. Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.; 1971.

Criddle RS, Church JN, Smith BN, Hansen LD. Fundamental causes of the global patterns of species range and richness. Russ. J. Pl. Physiol. 2003;50(4):192–199.

Nautiyal S. Structure of central Himalayan Forests under Different Management Regimes: An empirical study. Proceedings of Institute of Social and Economic Change. India: 2008;1–30.

Mishra BP, Tripathi OP, Laloo RC. Community characteristics of a climax subtropical humid forest of Meghalaya and population structure of ten important tree species. Trop. Ecol. 2005;46:241–251.

Kumar JIN, Kumar RN, Bhoi RK, Sajish PR. Tree species diversity and soil nutrient status in three sites of tropical dry deciduous forest of western India. Trop. Ecol. 2010;51:273–279.

Sathish BN, Viswanath S, Kushalappa CG, Jagadish MR, Ganeshaiah KN. Comparative assessment of floristic structure, diversity and regeneration status of tropical rain forests of Western Ghats of Karnataka, India. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2013;5: 157–164.

Adekunle VAJ, Olagoke AO, Akinele SO. Tree species diversity and structure of a Nigerian strict nature reserve. Trop. Ecol. 2013;54:275–289.

Naidu MT, Kumar OA. Tree diversity, stand structure, and community composition of tropical forests in Eastern Ghats of Andhra Pradesh, India. J. Asia Pacific Biodivers. 2016;9:328–334.

Sahu SC, Dhal NK, Mohanty RC. Tree species diversity and soil nutrient status in a tropical sacred forest ecosystem on Niyamgiri hill range, Eastern Ghats, India. Trop. Ecol. 2012;53:163–168.

Sundarapandian SM, Swamy PS. Forest ecosystem structure and composition along an altitudinal gradient in the Western Ghats, South India. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2000; 12:104–123.

Knight DH. A phytosociological analysis of species rich tropical forest on Barro-Colorado Island: Panama. Ecol. Monogr. 1975;45:259–289.

Lalfakawma, Sahoo UK, Roy S, Vanlalhriatpuia K, Vanalalhluna PC. Community composition and tree population structure in undisturbed and disturbed tropical semi-evergreen forest stands of North-East India. App. Ecol. Environm. Res. 2009;7:303–318.